37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 251453 |
Time | |
Date | 199309 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : lga |
State Reference | NY |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 11000 msl bound upper : 12000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Marginal |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Route In Use | enroute airway : n90 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 5000 flight time type : 1300 |
ASRS Report | 251453 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course flight crew : took evasive action other |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 6000 vertical : 500 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
ATC gave us clearance to descend to 11000 ft. As we descended through 13000 ft, ATC pointed out traffic at 10500 ft at 11 O'clock. We responded that we did not see him. Descending through about 11500 ft, we got a TA followed by an RA to climb. We followed the TCASII RA and climbed from about 11300 up to 12000 ft and then back down to 11000 ft. We reported to ny approach we were climbing due to a TCASII alert and the controller responded, 'whatever,' in a very sarcastic tone. Feeling that the controller did not understand or appreciate our responsibility, we replied to him something to the effect of, 'we are up here and you're in a safe swivel chair,' to which he replied (in a sarcastic voce) 'what did you guys do before you had TCASII?' at any rate, the entire exchange of words was unproductive and did not serve to further the pilot controller TCASII relationship. The bottom line for us, the pilot, is: if we get a TCASII RA and we do not have a visual on the aircraft, we must follow the RA.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC OF AN MLG ACR ACFT STOPPED DSCNT AND CLBED IN RESPONSE TO A TCASII RA.
Narrative: ATC GAVE US CLRNC TO DSND TO 11000 FT. AS WE DSNDED THROUGH 13000 FT, ATC POINTED OUT TFC AT 10500 FT AT 11 O'CLOCK. WE RESPONDED THAT WE DID NOT SEE HIM. DSNDING THROUGH ABOUT 11500 FT, WE GOT A TA FOLLOWED BY AN RA TO CLB. WE FOLLOWED THE TCASII RA AND CLBED FROM ABOUT 11300 UP TO 12000 FT AND THEN BACK DOWN TO 11000 FT. WE RPTED TO NY APCH WE WERE CLBING DUE TO A TCASII ALERT AND THE CTLR RESPONDED, 'WHATEVER,' IN A VERY SARCASTIC TONE. FEELING THAT THE CTLR DID NOT UNDERSTAND OR APPRECIATE OUR RESPONSIBILITY, WE REPLIED TO HIM SOMETHING TO THE EFFECT OF, 'WE ARE UP HERE AND YOU'RE IN A SAFE SWIVEL CHAIR,' TO WHICH HE REPLIED (IN A SARCASTIC VOCE) 'WHAT DID YOU GUYS DO BEFORE YOU HAD TCASII?' AT ANY RATE, THE ENTIRE EXCHANGE OF WORDS WAS UNPRODUCTIVE AND DID NOT SERVE TO FURTHER THE PLT CTLR TCASII RELATIONSHIP. THE BOTTOM LINE FOR US, THE PLT, IS: IF WE GET A TCASII RA AND WE DO NOT HAVE A VISUAL ON THE ACFT, WE MUST FOLLOW THE RA.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.