Missed approach procedure - the ARTCC radar controller advised pilot that he interfered with other t...

Attributes
ACN	302924
Time
Date	199504
Day	Sat
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : txk
State Reference	AR
Altitude	msl bound lower : 1500 msl bound upper : 1500
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	artcc : zfw tower : txk
Operator	general aviation : instructional
Make Model Name	Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	descent : approach landing : missed approach
Route In Use	enroute : on vectors
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	Other
Function	flight crew : single pilot
Qualification	pilot : cfi pilot : commercial
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 90 flight time total : 830 flight time type : 115
ASRS Report	302924
Person 2
Affiliation	Other
Function	flight crew : single pilot
Qualification	pilot : instrument pilot : private
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact other
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

We were executing the missed approach to ILS runway 22 at txk, we began our missed approach clearance given by ZFW, which differed from published. When we reported back to ZFW we were advised we had flown into a path of another aircraft. I would recommend that there be better communication between ctrs and towers. When missed approach clrncs are given, especially when they differ from the published. One possibility is to have tower specify the missed approach point and give the clearance when traffic conflicts may arise. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the pilot admitted that he had not gone to the published missed approach point before starting the turn to the assigned heading. Following this correct procedure will insure a standard, clear of terrain and an expected ground and flight path for the go around. Any other technique will be non standard, may strike high terrain and be unexpected by the controllers and other traffic. The reporter did not seem receptive when I spoke with him. The reporter was flying a C-172 with an instrument rated pilot friend at the time of the incident.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MISSED APCH PROC - THE ARTCC RADAR CTLR ADVISED PLT THAT HE INTERFERED WITH OTHER TFC BY TURNING TO THE MISSED APCH HDG TOO SOON.

Narrative: WE WERE EXECUTING THE MISSED APCH TO ILS RWY 22 AT TXK, WE BEGAN OUR MISSED APCH CLRNC GIVEN BY ZFW, WHICH DIFFERED FROM PUBLISHED. WHEN WE RPTED BACK TO ZFW WE WERE ADVISED WE HAD FLOWN INTO A PATH OF ANOTHER ACFT. I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THERE BE BETTER COM BTWN CTRS AND TWRS. WHEN MISSED APCH CLRNCS ARE GIVEN, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY DIFFER FROM THE PUBLISHED. ONE POSSIBILITY IS TO HAVE TWR SPECIFY THE MISSED APCH POINT AND GIVE THE CLRNC WHEN TFC CONFLICTS MAY ARISE. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE PLT ADMITTED THAT HE HAD NOT GONE TO THE PUBLISHED MISSED APCH POINT BEFORE STARTING THE TURN TO THE ASSIGNED HDG. FOLLOWING THIS CORRECT PROC WILL INSURE A STANDARD, CLR OF TERRAIN AND AN EXPECTED GND AND FLT PATH FOR THE GAR. ANY OTHER TECHNIQUE WILL BE NON STANDARD, MAY STRIKE HIGH TERRAIN AND BE UNEXPECTED BY THE CTLRS AND OTHER TFC. THE RPTR DID NOT SEEM RECEPTIVE WHEN I SPOKE WITH HIM. THE RPTR WAS FLYING A C-172 WITH AN INST RATED PLT FRIEND AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Missed approach procedure - the ARTCC radar controller advised pilot that he interfered with other traffic by turning to the missed approach heading too soon.