37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 319510 |
Time | |
Date | 199510 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : stl airport : sus |
State Reference | MO |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent other landing other |
Route In Use | approach : visual enroute other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 60 flight time total : 1350 |
ASRS Report | 319510 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Qualification | controller : non radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
While traveling around and below class B airspace in strong winds and fairly strong turbulence, allowed sighting of a not really unique landmark to lead to locating the wrong airport and landing at a class D airspace airport instead of the intended uncontrolled airport about 12 mi away. Strong winds and turbulence had an effect but the primary cause was failure to use the available navigation tools which would have shown the error. A simple lack of pilot performance. I let the presence of sophisticated navigation equipment lead me to use less than adequate VFR techniques but on sighting a river bend and island I assumed I was at a point other than the actual location and didn't even verify against the GPS or LORAN. The GPS and LORAN can contribute mightily to accurate, safe, and legal operation of the aircraft but do not relieve the pilot of the job of navigation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: LNDG AT WRONG ARPT.
Narrative: WHILE TRAVELING AROUND AND BELOW CLASS B AIRSPACE IN STRONG WINDS AND FAIRLY STRONG TURB, ALLOWED SIGHTING OF A NOT REALLY UNIQUE LANDMARK TO LEAD TO LOCATING THE WRONG ARPT AND LNDG AT A CLASS D AIRSPACE ARPT INSTEAD OF THE INTENDED UNCTLED ARPT ABOUT 12 MI AWAY. STRONG WINDS AND TURB HAD AN EFFECT BUT THE PRIMARY CAUSE WAS FAILURE TO USE THE AVAILABLE NAV TOOLS WHICH WOULD HAVE SHOWN THE ERROR. A SIMPLE LACK OF PLT PERFORMANCE. I LET THE PRESENCE OF SOPHISTICATED NAV EQUIP LEAD ME TO USE LESS THAN ADEQUATE VFR TECHNIQUES BUT ON SIGHTING A RIVER BEND AND ISLAND I ASSUMED I WAS AT A POINT OTHER THAN THE ACTUAL LOCATION AND DIDN'T EVEN VERIFY AGAINST THE GPS OR LORAN. THE GPS AND LORAN CAN CONTRIBUTE MIGHTILY TO ACCURATE, SAFE, AND LEGAL OP OF THE ACFT BUT DO NOT RELIEVE THE PLT OF THE JOB OF NAV.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.