Narrative:

I was about 1 NM west of wendover, ut, and wanted to fly south which would take me through R-6405. The salt lake sectional chart indicated that R-6405 airspace went from '100 ft AGL to FL580.' I took this to mean from 10000 ft AGL to 58000 ft in keeping with the convention of dropping the last 2 zeros as is indicated by 'FL580' in same phrase. This convention is widely used in other FAA and WX reporting applications such as sequence WX reports and forecast cloud bases which are abbreviated with last 2 zeros missing. It doesn't seem logical to mix altitude denominations in the same phrase because of the chance of mistake. I suggest using the words '100 ft above ground to 58000 ft (FL580)' be used which would eliminate possible confusion.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: RPTR PLT ENTERED RESTR AREA WITHOUT CLRNC. CLAIMS CONFUSION WITH ALTS DEPICTED IN SECTIONAL CHART.

Narrative: I WAS ABOUT 1 NM W OF WENDOVER, UT, AND WANTED TO FLY S WHICH WOULD TAKE ME THROUGH R-6405. THE SALT LAKE SECTIONAL CHART INDICATED THAT R-6405 AIRSPACE WENT FROM '100 FT AGL TO FL580.' I TOOK THIS TO MEAN FROM 10000 FT AGL TO 58000 FT IN KEEPING WITH THE CONVENTION OF DROPPING THE LAST 2 ZEROS AS IS INDICATED BY 'FL580' IN SAME PHRASE. THIS CONVENTION IS WIDELY USED IN OTHER FAA AND WX RPTING APPLICATIONS SUCH AS SEQUENCE WX RPTS AND FORECAST CLOUD BASES WHICH ARE ABBREVIATED WITH LAST 2 ZEROS MISSING. IT DOESN'T SEEM LOGICAL TO MIX ALT DENOMINATIONS IN THE SAME PHRASE BECAUSE OF THE CHANCE OF MISTAKE. I SUGGEST USING THE WORDS '100 FT ABOVE GND TO 58000 FT (FL580)' BE USED WHICH WOULD ELIMINATE POSSIBLE CONFUSION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.