37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 473224 |
Time | |
Date | 200005 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 0001 To 0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mem.airport |
State Reference | TN |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A310 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mem.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 77 flight time total : 5362 flight time type : 1111 |
ASRS Report | 473224 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : taxiway non adherence : clearance |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
We (airbus) just landed mem runway 36L and cleared runway. Switched to ground and were instructed to turn left on taxiway north and follow company (at least that's what we heard). Just prior to turning, we saw another aircraft coming our way (air carrier Z). We stopped prior to turn and questioned ground. They said air carrier Z could get past us and then we could turn left and follow company air carrier Y. There was never any close call -- neither aircraft in danger. Also, ground control and crew with air carrier Z aircraft didn't seem upset. I think part of the problem in this instance was twofold. 1) we were interested in getting off runway because another aircraft was behind us for landing. 2) at least part of taxi instructions were issued while we were slowing the aircraft down and exiting the runway. When stopping/slowing aircraft during landing rollout is not really the time to obtain taxi directions.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A310 CREW APPARENTLY TOOK WRONG TXWY AT MEM.
Narrative: WE (AIRBUS) JUST LANDED MEM RWY 36L AND CLRED RWY. SWITCHED TO GND AND WERE INSTRUCTED TO TURN L ON TXWY N AND FOLLOW COMPANY (AT LEAST THAT'S WHAT WE HEARD). JUST PRIOR TO TURNING, WE SAW ANOTHER ACFT COMING OUR WAY (ACR Z). WE STOPPED PRIOR TO TURN AND QUESTIONED GND. THEY SAID ACR Z COULD GET PAST US AND THEN WE COULD TURN L AND FOLLOW COMPANY ACR Y. THERE WAS NEVER ANY CLOSE CALL -- NEITHER ACFT IN DANGER. ALSO, GND CTL AND CREW WITH ACR Z ACFT DIDN'T SEEM UPSET. I THINK PART OF THE PROB IN THIS INSTANCE WAS TWOFOLD. 1) WE WERE INTERESTED IN GETTING OFF RWY BECAUSE ANOTHER ACFT WAS BEHIND US FOR LNDG. 2) AT LEAST PART OF TAXI INSTRUCTIONS WERE ISSUED WHILE WE WERE SLOWING THE ACFT DOWN AND EXITING THE RWY. WHEN STOPPING/SLOWING ACFT DURING LNDG ROLLOUT IS NOT REALLY THE TIME TO OBTAIN TAXI DIRECTIONS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.