Narrative:

I was taking over a company aircraft from another pilot. I had not flown this particular aircraft for 8 months. I am an experienced aerial survey pilot, but I was distraction by my rustiness with the aircraft and the use of a new aerial survey navigation system. While I tried to be attentive, the one checklist item I missed was to put the transponder to 'altitude.' it was during the return to our base airport that I discovered the omission and I did turn it on at that time. I had been flying over the slc class B airspace for some 3 hours. No class B airspace was violated, but I was in the veil area. From the start I decided not to talk to ATC because we could completely avoid class B airspace and were close enough to the airport to avoid corridors and I didn't need the added distraction ATC adds to these missions. The near midair collision was a combination of no squawk and no talk. Had I contacted ATC, the squawk problem would have been solved. Although talking with ATC very evidently causes problems for us in that ATC seems to consider us an annoyance and is often uncooperative in allowing us to utilize our airspace, if ATC were more cooperative with aerial survey missions I would not be so reticent to use them when, technically, I didn't have to. Whenever I fly in controller's airspace (class B, C, or D), I am in contact with the controllers. This near midair collision would have been prevented by a flawless checklist completion and/or talking with ATC.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A PA31 AERIAL SURVEY PLT WITHOUT HIS MODE C TURNED ON HAS AN NMAC WITH AN UNKNOWN TYPE ACFT WHO CLBED THROUGH HIS ALT AT 14500 FT ABOVE CLASS B AIRSPACE AT SLC, UT.

Narrative: I WAS TAKING OVER A COMPANY ACFT FROM ANOTHER PLT. I HAD NOT FLOWN THIS PARTICULAR ACFT FOR 8 MONTHS. I AM AN EXPERIENCED AERIAL SURVEY PLT, BUT I WAS DISTR BY MY RUSTINESS WITH THE ACFT AND THE USE OF A NEW AERIAL SURVEY NAV SYS. WHILE I TRIED TO BE ATTENTIVE, THE ONE CHKLIST ITEM I MISSED WAS TO PUT THE XPONDER TO 'ALT.' IT WAS DURING THE RETURN TO OUR BASE ARPT THAT I DISCOVERED THE OMISSION AND I DID TURN IT ON AT THAT TIME. I HAD BEEN FLYING OVER THE SLC CLASS B AIRSPACE FOR SOME 3 HRS. NO CLASS B AIRSPACE WAS VIOLATED, BUT I WAS IN THE VEIL AREA. FROM THE START I DECIDED NOT TO TALK TO ATC BECAUSE WE COULD COMPLETELY AVOID CLASS B AIRSPACE AND WERE CLOSE ENOUGH TO THE ARPT TO AVOID CORRIDORS AND I DIDN'T NEED THE ADDED DISTR ATC ADDS TO THESE MISSIONS. THE NMAC WAS A COMBINATION OF NO SQUAWK AND NO TALK. HAD I CONTACTED ATC, THE SQUAWK PROB WOULD HAVE BEEN SOLVED. ALTHOUGH TALKING WITH ATC VERY EVIDENTLY CAUSES PROBS FOR US IN THAT ATC SEEMS TO CONSIDER US AN ANNOYANCE AND IS OFTEN UNCOOPERATIVE IN ALLOWING US TO UTILIZE OUR AIRSPACE, IF ATC WERE MORE COOPERATIVE WITH AERIAL SURVEY MISSIONS I WOULD NOT BE SO RETICENT TO USE THEM WHEN, TECHNICALLY, I DIDN'T HAVE TO. WHENEVER I FLY IN CTLR'S AIRSPACE (CLASS B, C, OR D), I AM IN CONTACT WITH THE CTLRS. THIS NMAC WOULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED BY A FLAWLESS CHKLIST COMPLETION AND/OR TALKING WITH ATC.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.