Narrative:

Tail strike on landing at phl. The aircraft has a different flap system than the A319-320. The nose attitude and aircraft feel are different in the landing phase. On landing at phl, I flew a stabilized coupled approach to 400 ft AGL. I then disconnected the autoplt. WX was clear, winds 360 degrees at 9 KTS, landing runway 27R. At 50 ft, as operations procedure requires, I retarded the power and performed what I thought was a normal transition to the landing attitude. The rate of descent did not decrease at the normal rate. I was applying back pressure when the aircraft made a firm touchdown and the nose pitched up resulting in a tail strike.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A321 FO LOST CTL OF THE ACFT DURING LNDG FLARE RESULTING IN A HARD LNDG AND A TAIL STRIKE. THE AFT TAILSKID AREA OF THE FUSELAGE WAS SCRAPED AND DAMAGED.

Narrative: TAIL STRIKE ON LNDG AT PHL. THE ACFT HAS A DIFFERENT FLAP SYS THAN THE A319-320. THE NOSE ATTITUDE AND ACFT FEEL ARE DIFFERENT IN THE LNDG PHASE. ON LNDG AT PHL, I FLEW A STABILIZED COUPLED APCH TO 400 FT AGL. I THEN DISCONNECTED THE AUTOPLT. WX WAS CLR, WINDS 360 DEGS AT 9 KTS, LNDG RWY 27R. AT 50 FT, AS OPS PROC REQUIRES, I RETARDED THE PWR AND PERFORMED WHAT I THOUGHT WAS A NORMAL TRANSITION TO THE LNDG ATTITUDE. THE RATE OF DSCNT DID NOT DECREASE AT THE NORMAL RATE. I WAS APPLYING BACK PRESSURE WHEN THE ACFT MADE A FIRM TOUCHDOWN AND THE NOSE PITCHED UP RESULTING IN A TAIL STRIKE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.