37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 527992 |
Time | |
Date | 200110 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : maintenance |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 140 flight time total : 7500 flight time type : 5000 |
ASRS Report | 527992 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper documentation maintenance problem : improper maintenance maintenance problem : non compliance with mel non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : logbook entry |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft Environmental Factor |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
We took aircraft X in ZZZ with MEL 30-3. Engine cowl valve light on bright with switch off. This had been written up earlier in the day and all maintenance procedures were reported to be verified and complete as noted in logbook and on the release. However, in cruise flight, I was looking at the MEL appendix section. In order for this aircraft to be operated in conditions above 10 degrees C, a modified cowl is required. Upon inspection of the cowl in ZZZ, it was unsure whether this cowl was actually modified or not. I called maintenance duty and they seemed surprised at my discovery, and insisted that this was a modified nose cowl. I described the cowl to them and at the time of this report, it seems that the cowl is unmodified, and I operated the aircraft X in conditions above 10 degrees C.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B737-200 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH AN ENG COWL ANTI-ICE VALVE INOP IN CONFLICT WITH THE MEL REQUIREMENTS.
Narrative: WE TOOK ACFT X IN ZZZ WITH MEL 30-3. ENG COWL VALVE LIGHT ON BRIGHT WITH SWITCH OFF. THIS HAD BEEN WRITTEN UP EARLIER IN THE DAY AND ALL MAINT PROCS WERE RPTED TO BE VERIFIED AND COMPLETE AS NOTED IN LOGBOOK AND ON THE RELEASE. HOWEVER, IN CRUISE FLT, I WAS LOOKING AT THE MEL APPENDIX SECTION. IN ORDER FOR THIS ACFT TO BE OPERATED IN CONDITIONS ABOVE 10 DEGS C, A MODIFIED COWL IS REQUIRED. UPON INSPECTION OF THE COWL IN ZZZ, IT WAS UNSURE WHETHER THIS COWL WAS ACTUALLY MODIFIED OR NOT. I CALLED MAINT DUTY AND THEY SEEMED SURPRISED AT MY DISCOVERY, AND INSISTED THAT THIS WAS A MODIFIED NOSE COWL. I DESCRIBED THE COWL TO THEM AND AT THE TIME OF THIS RPT, IT SEEMS THAT THE COWL IS UNMODIFIED, AND I OPERATED THE ACFT X IN CONDITIONS ABOVE 10 DEGS C.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.