37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 599285 |
Time | |
Date | 200311 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ict.airport |
State Reference | KS |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 1500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Weather Elements | Turbulence |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : ict.tracon tower : ict.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Learjet 35 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer only : 19l |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument non precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 120 flight time total : 9800 flight time type : 3300 |
ASRS Report | 599285 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude altitude deviation : overshoot inflight encounter : weather other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to assigned altitude |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Weather Environmental Factor Company |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
On the localizer outside the FAF with a clearance for the approach. In light to moderate turbulence, my altitude was 120 ft low during a planned airspeed decrease. During correcting my altitude, the first officer on the trip started banging his finger on the altimeter instead of making the proper verbal call. This being very distracting, I made a hand gesture to get him to stop. At this time, the first officer became very abusive, yelling at me during the rest of the approach. The WX was at minimums for the localizer approach and I had to focus on the approach and ignore the ravings of the first officer. This created an unsafe condition in the cockpit during a critical phase of flight. This being a part 135 trip, a higher level of professionalism is required. I am very concerned about the mental stability of this airman. Contributing factors: 1) lack of knowledge of far and operations specifications on the part of first officer, 2) poor training and lack of support for CRM on the company's part. The only action that I can take is to refuse to fly with this first officer, which may lead to my termination. Conclusion: I have never seen a company allow its first officer's to run all over a captain. It is unsafe to have a first officer throwing a temper tantrum on the final phase of a minimums non precision approach.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN LR35 PIC'S RPT ON AN EMOTIONAL OUTBREAK BY THE FO CREATING A TRAUMATIC SCENE IN THE COCKPIT RELATED TO CREW COORD PROCS DURING A NON PRECISION LOC APCH INTO ICT, KS.
Narrative: ON THE LOC OUTSIDE THE FAF WITH A CLRNC FOR THE APCH. IN LIGHT TO MODERATE TURB, MY ALT WAS 120 FT LOW DURING A PLANNED AIRSPD DECREASE. DURING CORRECTING MY ALT, THE FO ON THE TRIP STARTED BANGING HIS FINGER ON THE ALTIMETER INSTEAD OF MAKING THE PROPER VERBAL CALL. THIS BEING VERY DISTRACTING, I MADE A HAND GESTURE TO GET HIM TO STOP. AT THIS TIME, THE FO BECAME VERY ABUSIVE, YELLING AT ME DURING THE REST OF THE APCH. THE WX WAS AT MINIMUMS FOR THE LOC APCH AND I HAD TO FOCUS ON THE APCH AND IGNORE THE RAVINGS OF THE FO. THIS CREATED AN UNSAFE CONDITION IN THE COCKPIT DURING A CRITICAL PHASE OF FLT. THIS BEING A PART 135 TRIP, A HIGHER LEVEL OF PROFESSIONALISM IS REQUIRED. I AM VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE MENTAL STABILITY OF THIS AIRMAN. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS: 1) LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF FAR AND OPS SPECS ON THE PART OF FO, 2) POOR TRAINING AND LACK OF SUPPORT FOR CRM ON THE COMPANY'S PART. THE ONLY ACTION THAT I CAN TAKE IS TO REFUSE TO FLY WITH THIS FO, WHICH MAY LEAD TO MY TERMINATION. CONCLUSION: I HAVE NEVER SEEN A COMPANY ALLOW ITS FO'S TO RUN ALL OVER A CAPT. IT IS UNSAFE TO HAVE A FO THROWING A TEMPER TANTRUM ON THE FINAL PHASE OF A MINIMUMS NON PRECISION APCH.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.