37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 616031 |
Time | |
Date | 200404 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sju.airport |
State Reference | PR |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A330 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | ground : parked ground : pushback |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 90 flight time total : 13000 flight time type : 250 |
ASRS Report | 616031 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : atp pilot : cfi pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 12000 flight time type : 2800 |
ASRS Report | 616897 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : company policies non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other anomaly |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : ecam cargo door warning other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : regained aircraft control flight crew : took precautionary avoidance action other |
Consequence | other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : testing performance deficiency : repair performance deficiency : fault isolation performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft Company Flight Crew Human Performance Maintenance Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
On pushback, a cargo door light annunciated during pushback and engine start. I instructed the ground push crew to stay connected because they would have to tow us back in to the gate. I released the parking brake after I said I was releasing it and directed them to tow us back to the gate. Soon I received a visual indication from the ground crew to stop. I did. I then realized that we weren't being pulled by the tug, but instead rolling under our own power. No damage or injuries resulted. I believe the incident was primarily caused by the inability of the ground crew to understand my english. The contributing factors were crew distraction and workload management. We were busy dealing with checklists and abnormal procedures. The cockpit and cabin were also very hot because the packs do not operate when the engines are running and the cargo door indicates open. Supplemental information from acn 616897: at the conclusion of the start procedure, we received an ECAM warning that the forward cargo door was open and the packs were inoperative. (This was a recurring problem with this aircraft. We have no reason to believe that the door was actually open on indication problem only.) the captain informed the ground crew (through the interphone) 'confirm tow bar connected.' the ground coordinator stated 'ok.' the captain stated he was releasing brakes and then did so. We started to move. When I looked up, we were passing our gate and increasing speed. We then noticed the wing walker giving us the stop signal. I said, 'I don't think we're connected.' the captain and I were reluctant to apply the brakes for fear of snapping and damaging the nose gear. Soon, the captain decided that we had traveled far enough. He applied the brakes. We then returned to the gate under our own power, having realized that the tow bar had been disconnected. Observation: better to have forced the agent to report what we told him.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A330 CAPT RELEASED THE BRAKES TO BE TOWED BACK TO THE GATE. THE CREW DISCOVERED THEY WERE ROLLING WITH NO TUG ATTACHED.
Narrative: ON PUSHBACK, A CARGO DOOR LIGHT ANNUNCIATED DURING PUSHBACK AND ENG START. I INSTRUCTED THE GND PUSH CREW TO STAY CONNECTED BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE TO TOW US BACK IN TO THE GATE. I RELEASED THE PARKING BRAKE AFTER I SAID I WAS RELEASING IT AND DIRECTED THEM TO TOW US BACK TO THE GATE. SOON I RECEIVED A VISUAL INDICATION FROM THE GND CREW TO STOP. I DID. I THEN REALIZED THAT WE WEREN'T BEING PULLED BY THE TUG, BUT INSTEAD ROLLING UNDER OUR OWN PWR. NO DAMAGE OR INJURIES RESULTED. I BELIEVE THE INCIDENT WAS PRIMARILY CAUSED BY THE INABILITY OF THE GND CREW TO UNDERSTAND MY ENGLISH. THE CONTRIBUTING FACTORS WERE CREW DISTR AND WORKLOAD MGMNT. WE WERE BUSY DEALING WITH CHKLISTS AND ABNORMAL PROCS. THE COCKPIT AND CABIN WERE ALSO VERY HOT BECAUSE THE PACKS DO NOT OPERATE WHEN THE ENGS ARE RUNNING AND THE CARGO DOOR INDICATES OPEN. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 616897: AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE START PROC, WE RECEIVED AN ECAM WARNING THAT THE FORWARD CARGO DOOR WAS OPEN AND THE PACKS WERE INOP. (THIS WAS A RECURRING PROB WITH THIS ACFT. WE HAVE NO REASON TO BELIEVE THAT THE DOOR WAS ACTUALLY OPEN ON INDICATION PROB ONLY.) THE CAPT INFORMED THE GND CREW (THROUGH THE INTERPHONE) 'CONFIRM TOW BAR CONNECTED.' THE GND COORDINATOR STATED 'OK.' THE CAPT STATED HE WAS RELEASING BRAKES AND THEN DID SO. WE STARTED TO MOVE. WHEN I LOOKED UP, WE WERE PASSING OUR GATE AND INCREASING SPD. WE THEN NOTICED THE WING WALKER GIVING US THE STOP SIGNAL. I SAID, 'I DON'T THINK WE'RE CONNECTED.' THE CAPT AND I WERE RELUCTANT TO APPLY THE BRAKES FOR FEAR OF SNAPPING AND DAMAGING THE NOSE GEAR. SOON, THE CAPT DECIDED THAT WE HAD TRAVELED FAR ENOUGH. HE APPLIED THE BRAKES. WE THEN RETURNED TO THE GATE UNDER OUR OWN PWR, HAVING REALIZED THAT THE TOW BAR HAD BEEN DISCONNECTED. OBSERVATION: BETTER TO HAVE FORCED THE AGENT TO RPT WHAT WE TOLD HIM.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.