37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 634867 |
Time | |
Date | 200410 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : flg.airport |
State Reference | AZ |
Altitude | agl single value : 400 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Weather Elements | Snow |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Dash 8-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 21 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : multi engine |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 163 flight time total : 2133 flight time type : 630 |
ASRS Report | 634867 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 56 flight time total : 2260 flight time type : 56 |
ASRS Report | 634582 |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : ground less severe ground encounters other non adherence : published procedure non adherence other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Airport ATC Human Performance Weather |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
Night ILS approach in snow into flg. Captain flew instrument approach. First officer failed to make CTAF position reports at uncontrolled airport. Normal and uneventful landing. However, snowplows were on the runway at time of landing, near the far end of runway 21. I believe the high workload involved with the night approach in snow was the biggest contributor to the first officer not making radio calls which would have alerted the snowplow. ATC sent us to CTAF during a very busy portion of the approach. ATC, ASOS, or company dispatch never mentioned the snowplowing in progress. First officer had not flown in 16 days and was 'behind' his duties during most of the flight. First officer had very limited experience in the aircraft. Supplemental information from acn 634582: the WX was down to minimums on the approach. Abq cleared us to the CTAF late (after the FAF).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A DH82 CREW FAILED TO CALL FINAL AT A CTAF ARPT AND LANDED WHILE SNOWPLOWS WERE EXITING THE RWY.
Narrative: NIGHT ILS APCH IN SNOW INTO FLG. CAPT FLEW INST APCH. FO FAILED TO MAKE CTAF POS RPTS AT UNCTLED ARPT. NORMAL AND UNEVENTFUL LNDG. HOWEVER, SNOWPLOWS WERE ON THE RWY AT TIME OF LNDG, NEAR THE FAR END OF RWY 21. I BELIEVE THE HIGH WORKLOAD INVOLVED WITH THE NIGHT APCH IN SNOW WAS THE BIGGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO THE FO NOT MAKING RADIO CALLS WHICH WOULD HAVE ALERTED THE SNOWPLOW. ATC SENT US TO CTAF DURING A VERY BUSY PORTION OF THE APCH. ATC, ASOS, OR COMPANY DISPATCH NEVER MENTIONED THE SNOWPLOWING IN PROGRESS. FO HAD NOT FLOWN IN 16 DAYS AND WAS 'BEHIND' HIS DUTIES DURING MOST OF THE FLT. FO HAD VERY LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN THE ACFT. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 634582: THE WX WAS DOWN TO MINIMUMS ON THE APCH. ABQ CLRED US TO THE CTAF LATE (AFTER THE FAF).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.