Narrative:

MEL 26-4 concerns an inoperative engine fire bottle. It requires an inspection of the good fire bottle only once per flight day. I feel this is an unsafe MEL. The good bottle (in my opinion) should be inspected prior to each flight. Please reference MEL's 35-1; 29-8; 29-9; and 29-10. These MEL's require an inspection prior to each flight. In the case of 29-8-9 and 10; these concern the hydraulic fluid and pressure indication. Example: if 1 hydraulic fluid indicator is inoperative; a visual check is made prior to each flight to verify hydraulic quantity even though there would be physical and visual evidence of a hydraulic leak during post- or preflight. In the case of MEL 26-4; there would be no visible of physical indication that the remaining bottle had lost its pressure. Please reconsider this MEL.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN EMB145 CAPT EXPRESSES CONCERN OVER DEFERRAL OF 1 ENG FIRE EXTINGUISHER BOTTLE BEING INOP. BELIEVES CHK SHOULD BE MADE OF REMAINING BOTTLE PRIOR TO EACH DEP.

Narrative: MEL 26-4 CONCERNS AN INOP ENG FIRE BOTTLE. IT REQUIRES AN INSPECTION OF THE GOOD FIRE BOTTLE ONLY ONCE PER FLT DAY. I FEEL THIS IS AN UNSAFE MEL. THE GOOD BOTTLE (IN MY OPINION) SHOULD BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO EACH FLT. PLEASE REF MEL'S 35-1; 29-8; 29-9; AND 29-10. THESE MEL'S REQUIRE AN INSPECTION PRIOR TO EACH FLT. IN THE CASE OF 29-8-9 AND 10; THESE CONCERN THE HYD FLUID AND PRESSURE INDICATION. EXAMPLE: IF 1 HYD FLUID INDICATOR IS INOP; A VISUAL CHK IS MADE PRIOR TO EACH FLT TO VERIFY HYD QUANTITY EVEN THOUGH THERE WOULD BE PHYSICAL AND VISUAL EVIDENCE OF A HYD LEAK DURING POST- OR PREFLT. IN THE CASE OF MEL 26-4; THERE WOULD BE NO VISIBLE OF PHYSICAL INDICATION THAT THE REMAINING BOTTLE HAD LOST ITS PRESSURE. PLEASE RECONSIDER THIS MEL.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.