MD80 fails to program required en route transition on RNAV SID from dfw.

Attributes
ACN	676691
Time
Date	200510
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	atc facility : zfw.artcc
State Reference	TX
Altitude	msl single value : 30000
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Dusk
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	artcc : zfw.artcc
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Navigation In Use	other Other
Flight Phase	climbout : intermediate altitude
Route In Use	departure sid : clare
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
ASRS Report	676691
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	controller : issued new clearance flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance Chart Or Publication Aircraft
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

Dfw departure clare 2 RNAV climbing through FL300 ft worth 126.57. Waypoints poten and tekbe were omitted because after clare 2 was loaded in GPS failed to select transition. This put us approximately 20 degrees south of course. ATC gave us heading to correct. No conflict. ATC said no problem. We did compare GPS vs flight plan at gate. I read from GPS while first officer checked flight plan. First officer did not pick up omission of waypoints. We discussed the event and vowed to be more vigilant.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MD80 FAILS TO PROGRAM REQUIRED ENRTE TRANSITION ON RNAV SID FROM DFW.

Narrative: DFW DEP CLARE 2 RNAV CLBING THROUGH FL300 FT WORTH 126.57. WAYPOINTS POTEN AND TEKBE WERE OMITTED BECAUSE AFTER CLARE 2 WAS LOADED IN GPS FAILED TO SELECT TRANSITION. THIS PUT US APPROX 20 DEGS S OF COURSE. ATC GAVE US HEADING TO CORRECT. NO CONFLICT. ATC SAID NO PROB. WE DID COMPARE GPS VS FLT PLAN AT GATE. I READ FROM GPS WHILE FO CHKED FLT PLAN. FO DID NOT PICK UP OMISSION OF WAYPOINTS. WE DISCUSSED THE EVENT AND VOWED TO BE MORE VIGILANT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.