37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 694599 |
Time | |
Date | 200604 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : zjx.artcc |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | msl single value : 24000 |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zjx.artcc tower : iah.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | arrival : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zjx.artcc |
Operator | other |
Make Model Name | Military |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : radar |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller radar : 14 controller time certified in position1 : 14 |
ASRS Report | 694599 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : required legal separation |
Independent Detector | atc equipment : conflict alert other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance controller : issued alert flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : investigated |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
I was working R48 and we combined R47 onto my sector which added the lower altitudes to the ones I was already working. Among the planes I acquired when we combined was aircraft Y at FL240. A few mins later we combined sectors; I had air carrier X check on who was landing chs. I gave air carrier X a descent clearance to FL240 which is the base of my altitudes and began flashing the aircraft to the low sector. He was not in conflict with aircraft Y on his current routing. The low controller called and asked that I put air carrier X on an assigned heading at 190 degrees. I assigned the heading requested by the controller and switched the aircraft to that controller. I also within that same time period had switched aircraft Y to ZDC. The new heading assigned to air carrier X turned the aircraft into aircraft Y and when the conflict alert initiated; the controller in communication with air carrier X turned the aircraft west and re-established separation but our minimums were violated. I wasn't communicating with either aircraft at the actual time separation was lost.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ZJX CTLR EXPERIENCED OPERROR AT FL240; ASSIGNING CONFLICTING HDGS TO THE ACFT AND THEN XFERRED BOTH ACFT TO 2 DIFFERENT CTLRS.
Narrative: I WAS WORKING R48 AND WE COMBINED R47 ONTO MY SECTOR WHICH ADDED THE LOWER ALTS TO THE ONES I WAS ALREADY WORKING. AMONG THE PLANES I ACQUIRED WHEN WE COMBINED WAS ACFT Y AT FL240. A FEW MINS LATER WE COMBINED SECTORS; I HAD ACR X CHK ON WHO WAS LNDG CHS. I GAVE ACR X A DSCNT CLRNC TO FL240 WHICH IS THE BASE OF MY ALTS AND BEGAN FLASHING THE ACFT TO THE LOW SECTOR. HE WAS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH ACFT Y ON HIS CURRENT ROUTING. THE LOW CTLR CALLED AND ASKED THAT I PUT ACR X ON AN ASSIGNED HDG AT 190 DEGS. I ASSIGNED THE HDG REQUESTED BY THE CTLR AND SWITCHED THE ACFT TO THAT CTLR. I ALSO WITHIN THAT SAME TIME PERIOD HAD SWITCHED ACFT Y TO ZDC. THE NEW HDG ASSIGNED TO ACR X TURNED THE ACFT INTO ACFT Y AND WHEN THE CONFLICT ALERT INITIATED; THE CTLR IN COM WITH ACR X TURNED THE ACFT WEST AND RE-ESTABLISHED SEPARATION BUT OUR MINIMUMS WERE VIOLATED. I WASN'T COMMUNICATING WITH EITHER ACFT AT THE ACTUAL TIME SEPARATION WAS LOST.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.