37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 84821 |
Time | |
Date | 198804 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : bdr |
State Reference | CT |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 3600 msl bound upper : 4000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : n90 |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Transport |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 1 Eng, Retractable Gear |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 2780 flight time type : 370 |
ASRS Report | 84821 |
Person 2 | |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 50 vertical : 100 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
Over bridgeport we were notified of traffic 12 O'clock, 3 miles swbound altitude reads 3600' not verified'. We looked but nothing to be seen. Next call was traffic alert with heading. Turning immediately to the left, bank angle approximately 45 degree, I spotted the traffic, an small aircraft 100' below us. Horizontal distance less than 50'. Had we not climbed and turned, a collision would have been certain. The pilot in the small aircraft never saw us. He was in a VFR climb to 4000! The same aircraft called in 4 min later, verifying his altitude. Why he was not violated, I don't know. Maybe he has one coming. ATC did a great job. One way of preventing VFR traffic from flying at the wrong altitudes would be to decrease the time between biannuals and ensuring that the FARS are still in the back of ones mind before they fly.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: NMAC BETWEEN ACR MDT AND GA SMA.
Narrative: OVER BRIDGEPORT WE WERE NOTIFIED OF TFC 12 O'CLOCK, 3 MILES SWBOUND ALT READS 3600' NOT VERIFIED'. WE LOOKED BUT NOTHING TO BE SEEN. NEXT CALL WAS TFC ALERT WITH HEADING. TURNING IMMEDIATELY TO THE LEFT, BANK ANGLE APPROX 45 DEG, I SPOTTED THE TFC, AN SMA 100' BELOW US. HORIZONTAL DISTANCE LESS THAN 50'. HAD WE NOT CLIMBED AND TURNED, A COLLISION WOULD HAVE BEEN CERTAIN. THE PLT IN THE SMA NEVER SAW US. HE WAS IN A VFR CLIMB TO 4000! THE SAME ACFT CALLED IN 4 MIN LATER, VERIFYING HIS ALT. WHY HE WAS NOT VIOLATED, I DON'T KNOW. MAYBE HE HAS ONE COMING. ATC DID A GREAT JOB. ONE WAY OF PREVENTING VFR TFC FROM FLYING AT THE WRONG ALTS WOULD BE TO DECREASE THE TIME BETWEEN BIANNUALS AND ENSURING THAT THE FARS ARE STILL IN THE BACK OF ONES MIND BEFORE THEY FLY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.