37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 220940 |
Time | |
Date | 199208 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bim |
State Reference | FO |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | landing other |
Route In Use | arrival other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 0 flight time total : 300 flight time type : 25 |
ASRS Report | 220940 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | observation : passenger |
Qualification | other other : other |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other anomaly |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
The pilot (myself) was not 90 days current to carry passenger with possibly 25 hours in type small aircraft. The plane was very close to gross weight. Because the airspeed gauge is marked in both miles per hour and KTS per hour, the aircraft was brought in at an approach speed closer to 65 KTS instead of an approach speed of 80 KTS, which the operator's manual calls for. At 100 ft, the plane began to sink at what seemed a faster than normal rate. I added additional power, but not sufficient. As the plane came over the numbers, the crosswind pushed the plane to the left and the wingtip made contact with the runway surface. I pulled the nose up for the flare and the plane landed hard on the mains. There was 1 pilot and 2 passenger. No one on board was even aware that wing contact had occurred until a post landing inspection was done. The wheel fairings were cracked from the hard impact. After inspection, we decided it was safe to fly home and we did so the next day, back to ft lauderdale, fl, fxe.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN SMA PLT MADE A HARD LNDG AND SCRAPED A WINGTIP IN A XWIND. HE GOT SLOW ON THE APCH.
Narrative: THE PLT (MYSELF) WAS NOT 90 DAYS CURRENT TO CARRY PAX WITH POSSIBLY 25 HRS IN TYPE SMA. THE PLANE WAS VERY CLOSE TO GROSS WT. BECAUSE THE AIRSPD GAUGE IS MARKED IN BOTH MILES PER HR AND KTS PER HR, THE ACFT WAS BROUGHT IN AT AN APCH SPD CLOSER TO 65 KTS INSTEAD OF AN APCH SPD OF 80 KTS, WHICH THE OPERATOR'S MANUAL CALLS FOR. AT 100 FT, THE PLANE BEGAN TO SINK AT WHAT SEEMED A FASTER THAN NORMAL RATE. I ADDED ADDITIONAL PWR, BUT NOT SUFFICIENT. AS THE PLANE CAME OVER THE NUMBERS, THE XWIND PUSHED THE PLANE TO THE L AND THE WINGTIP MADE CONTACT WITH THE RWY SURFACE. I PULLED THE NOSE UP FOR THE FLARE AND THE PLANE LANDED HARD ON THE MAINS. THERE WAS 1 PLT AND 2 PAX. NO ONE ON BOARD WAS EVEN AWARE THAT WING CONTACT HAD OCCURRED UNTIL A POST LNDG INSPECTION WAS DONE. THE WHEEL FAIRINGS WERE CRACKED FROM THE HARD IMPACT. AFTER INSPECTION, WE DECIDED IT WAS SAFE TO FLY HOME AND WE DID SO THE NEXT DAY, BACK TO FT LAUDERDALE, FL, FXE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.