37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 223256 |
Time | |
Date | 199210 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : atl |
State Reference | GA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | landing other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 5000 flight time type : 1000 |
ASRS Report | 223256 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 6000 flight time type : 2800 |
ASRS Report | 223365 |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : landing without clearance non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
First officer flying on final on ILS to runway 9R atl. At the marker we were instructed to contact atl tower. When we first attempted contact, there was no response. On the second attempt, the tower controller seemed confused as to who we were. He responded roger but did not clear us to land. We discussed the lack of landing clearance and continued with our checklist. Because of the low visibility we became very busy and neglected to insure our landing clearance. The tower then called us and asked us if we had landing clearance and then told us to call him on the ground. We stated that we were on the ground. Problem: throughout the approach we were under the impression that we were the only aircraft on approach to that runway. The tower controller seemed to be busy with other duties and simply forgot about us. There should have been clearance given to us at the OM when the visibility was that low.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC OF ACR MLG ACFT LANDED ACFT WITHOUT LNDG CLRNC.
Narrative: FO FLYING ON FINAL ON ILS TO RWY 9R ATL. AT THE MARKER WE WERE INSTRUCTED TO CONTACT ATL TWR. WHEN WE FIRST ATTEMPTED CONTACT, THERE WAS NO RESPONSE. ON THE SECOND ATTEMPT, THE TWR CTLR SEEMED CONFUSED AS TO WHO WE WERE. HE RESPONDED ROGER BUT DID NOT CLR US TO LAND. WE DISCUSSED THE LACK OF LNDG CLRNC AND CONTINUED WITH OUR CHKLIST. BECAUSE OF THE LOW VISIBILITY WE BECAME VERY BUSY AND NEGLECTED TO INSURE OUR LNDG CLRNC. THE TWR THEN CALLED US AND ASKED US IF WE HAD LNDG CLRNC AND THEN TOLD US TO CALL HIM ON THE GND. WE STATED THAT WE WERE ON THE GND. PROBLEM: THROUGHOUT THE APCH WE WERE UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT WE WERE THE ONLY ACFT ON APCH TO THAT RWY. THE TWR CTLR SEEMED TO BE BUSY WITH OTHER DUTIES AND SIMPLY FORGOT ABOUT US. THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN CLRNC GIVEN TO US AT THE OM WHEN THE VISIBILITY WAS THAT LOW.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.