37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 238510 |
Time | |
Date | 199304 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : 0q3 |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : bna |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | landing other |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : instructor oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : instrument |
ASRS Report | 238510 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : landing without clearance non adherence : far other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I had 2 instrument students aboard in an small aircraft. One of the students had been practicing VOR tracking with course reversals for about 30 mins at sgd VOR. I broke off the exercise to proceed to sonoma skypark for landing with intention to change student pilots. We had no sooner left the VOR when the student passenger expressed a pressing need for the bathroom. At age 69 I am very much aware of how pressing this need can become. I immediately diverted to sonoma valley. It had been raining in our area the night before and I was uncertain as to the condition of the dirt/gravel runway 27/9 so I opted for what I knew as runway 34, a paved strip. Because of my sense of urgency by what I considered a potential cockpit catastrophe I executed a power off short approach to what I had known for yrs to be runway 34. The runway was not runway 34 but a ramp I do not know how recent the change but because of my passenger physical needs I chose to land. I used less than 1/2 of the existing runway, executed a 180 degree turn and deplaned my passenger. When he returned to the aircraft we departed via runway 9 which I determined to be damp but suitable.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: UNAUTH LNDG ON RAMP INSTEAD OF RWY.
Narrative: I HAD 2 INST STUDENTS ABOARD IN AN SMA. ONE OF THE STUDENTS HAD BEEN PRACTICING VOR TRACKING WITH COURSE REVERSALS FOR ABOUT 30 MINS AT SGD VOR. I BROKE OFF THE EXERCISE TO PROCEED TO SONOMA SKYPARK FOR LNDG WITH INTENTION TO CHANGE STUDENT PLTS. WE HAD NO SOONER LEFT THE VOR WHEN THE STUDENT PAX EXPRESSED A PRESSING NEED FOR THE BATHROOM. AT AGE 69 I AM VERY MUCH AWARE OF HOW PRESSING THIS NEED CAN BECOME. I IMMEDIATELY DIVERTED TO SONOMA VALLEY. IT HAD BEEN RAINING IN OUR AREA THE NIGHT BEFORE AND I WAS UNCERTAIN AS TO THE CONDITION OF THE DIRT/GRAVEL RWY 27/9 SO I OPTED FOR WHAT I KNEW AS RWY 34, A PAVED STRIP. BECAUSE OF MY SENSE OF URGENCY BY WHAT I CONSIDERED A POTENTIAL COCKPIT CATASTROPHE I EXECUTED A PWR OFF SHORT APCH TO WHAT I HAD KNOWN FOR YRS TO BE RWY 34. THE RWY WAS NOT RWY 34 BUT A RAMP I DO NOT KNOW HOW RECENT THE CHANGE BUT BECAUSE OF MY PAX PHYSICAL NEEDS I CHOSE TO LAND. I USED LESS THAN 1/2 OF THE EXISTING RWY, EXECUTED A 180 DEG TURN AND DEPLANED MY PAX. WHEN HE RETURNED TO THE ACFT WE DEPARTED VIA RWY 9 WHICH I DETERMINED TO BE DAMP BUT SUITABLE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.