Narrative:

Descending into yuma (into rising sun) and with excellent visibility otherwise (descending eastbound) a sharp turn to right was necessary to avoid a wbound high wing cessna southeast (172 type?) at 4500 ft. A discrete squawk was on transponder and we were in voice contact with yuma approach on 124.7. Approach stated the cessna was showing 3600 ft, but the pilot had been at 4500 ft for some mins and so stated to approach. Approach later acknowledged 4500 ft as being correct. The question: why didn't approach advise of the potential conflict regardless of altitude difference?

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: 2 SMA'S HAD AN NMAC.

Narrative: DSNDING INTO YUMA (INTO RISING SUN) AND WITH EXCELLENT VISIBILITY OTHERWISE (DSNDING EBOUND) A SHARP TURN TO R WAS NECESSARY TO AVOID A WBOUND HIGH WING CESSNA SE (172 TYPE?) AT 4500 FT. A DISCRETE SQUAWK WAS ON XPONDER AND WE WERE IN VOICE CONTACT WITH YUMA APCH ON 124.7. APCH STATED THE CESSNA WAS SHOWING 3600 FT, BUT THE PLT HAD BEEN AT 4500 FT FOR SOME MINS AND SO STATED TO APCH. APCH LATER ACKNOWLEDGED 4500 FT AS BEING CORRECT. THE QUESTION: WHY DIDN'T APCH ADVISE OF THE POTENTIAL CONFLICT REGARDLESS OF ALT DIFFERENCE?

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.