Narrative:

Over charlotte VOR at 10000 ft, under clt approach control, we found ourselves being 'wedged' between 2 other aircraft. We got a TCASII RA which we followed, even though the controller told us to stay at 10000 ft. We only had to climb 300 ft and the RA was resolved. The first aircraft seen was a shorts 360, 800 ft above us descending. It passed off our left approximately 1500 ft horizontally. The second aircraft type was unknown. It was 300 ft below us and passed off to our right, very quickly, approximately 1 mi away. ATC advised us of the shorts and other, and immediately after we got the RA. We advised that we were getting an RA and climbing. He said to stay at 10000 ft. My company's procedure is to comply with the TCASII RA. So I did. Controller should have advised us sooner of conflicting traffic and have maintained greater separation for us.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLC OF AN MDT CLBED ABOVE ASSIGNED ALT IN RESPONSE TO A TCASII RA.

Narrative: OVER CHARLOTTE VOR AT 10000 FT, UNDER CLT APCH CTL, WE FOUND OURSELVES BEING 'WEDGED' BTWN 2 OTHER ACFT. WE GOT A TCASII RA WHICH WE FOLLOWED, EVEN THOUGH THE CTLR TOLD US TO STAY AT 10000 FT. WE ONLY HAD TO CLB 300 FT AND THE RA WAS RESOLVED. THE FIRST ACFT SEEN WAS A SHORTS 360, 800 FT ABOVE US DSNDING. IT PASSED OFF OUR L APPROX 1500 FT HORIZLY. THE SECOND ACFT TYPE WAS UNKNOWN. IT WAS 300 FT BELOW US AND PASSED OFF TO OUR R, VERY QUICKLY, APPROX 1 MI AWAY. ATC ADVISED US OF THE SHORTS AND OTHER, AND IMMEDIATELY AFTER WE GOT THE RA. WE ADVISED THAT WE WERE GETTING AN RA AND CLBING. HE SAID TO STAY AT 10000 FT. MY COMPANY'S PROC IS TO COMPLY WITH THE TCASII RA. SO I DID. CTLR SHOULD HAVE ADVISED US SOONER OF CONFLICTING TFC AND HAVE MAINTAINED GREATER SEPARATION FOR US.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.