Narrative:

During approach phase of flight, the APU was started. After completion of APU start cycle, we had an indication of an APU fire. We followed procedure for an APU fire and secured the APU, declared an emergency, and landed in dsm. No evacuate/evacuation occurred as APU fire indication went out after using the APU fire bottle. Subsequent landing was normal. After inspection of the aircraft found no apparent indication of fire. Aircraft was inspected by maintenance and they concurred there was no indication of actual fire. Maintenance discrepancy entered in logbook.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MDT ACFT IN APCH PHASE HAD APU FIRE WARNING AFTER STARTING IT. FLC FOLLOWED EMER PROCS, SHUT DOWN APU, DECLARED EMER, AND LANDED UNEVENTFULLY. POSTFLT INSPECTION SHOWED NO INDICATION OF FIRE.

Narrative: DURING APCH PHASE OF FLT, THE APU WAS STARTED. AFTER COMPLETION OF APU START CYCLE, WE HAD AN INDICATION OF AN APU FIRE. WE FOLLOWED PROC FOR AN APU FIRE AND SECURED THE APU, DECLARED AN EMER, AND LANDED IN DSM. NO EVAC OCCURRED AS APU FIRE INDICATION WENT OUT AFTER USING THE APU FIRE BOTTLE. SUBSEQUENT LNDG WAS NORMAL. AFTER INSPECTION OF THE ACFT FOUND NO APPARENT INDICATION OF FIRE. ACFT WAS INSPECTED BY MAINT AND THEY CONCURRED THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF ACTUAL FIRE. MAINT DISCREPANCY ENTERED IN LOGBOOK.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.