Training flight does a touch-and-go when the clearance was to land at srq, fl.

Attributes
ACN	460010
Time
Date	200001
Day	Wed
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : srq.airport
State Reference	FL
Altitude	agl bound upper : 1000 agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tower : srq.tower
Operator	general aviation : instructional
Make Model Name	Cessna 152
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Navigation In Use	other
Flight Phase	landing : touch and go
Route In Use	approach : traffic pattern
Flight Plan	None
Person 1
Affiliation	other
Function	instruction : instructor
Qualification	pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : cfi
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 850 flight time type : 400
ASRS Report	460010
Person 2
Function	instruction : trainee
Qualification	pilot : student
Events
Anomaly	aircraft equipment problem : unique event non adherence : clearance other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	controller : issued new clearance
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

I was instructing a foreign student with broken english. We were holding over the sarasota VOR when I let him take the radios to ask for a touch-and-go at srq. He responded to another aircraft's radio call from tpa approach and repeated the wrong runway number from srq tower. In the process of being handed off to srq tower, we were 'cleared to land.' I was carefully monitoring his radio procedures making sure he responded correctly. He repeated the clearance correctly, but we both had 'touch-and-go' in our mind. We proceeded to perform a touch-and-go on runway 4 at srq around XA40 in the morning. Upon takeoff, the controller asked our intentions and my student responded incorrectly again. The controller became somewhat upset and questioned the fact that we were airborne having received a clearance to 'aldn.' he explained he had traffic in the area and gave us a 250 degree vector. We then went to venice. My student was unaware of the problem, so a review of ground school occurred in postflt. I realized how I may have become a little complacent and must listen more carefully to ATC and not just my student.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: TRAINING FLT DOES A TOUCH-AND-GO WHEN THE CLRNC WAS TO LAND AT SRQ, FL.

Narrative: I WAS INSTRUCTING A FOREIGN STUDENT WITH BROKEN ENGLISH. WE WERE HOLDING OVER THE SARASOTA VOR WHEN I LET HIM TAKE THE RADIOS TO ASK FOR A TOUCH-AND-GO AT SRQ. HE RESPONDED TO ANOTHER ACFT'S RADIO CALL FROM TPA APCH AND REPEATED THE WRONG RWY NUMBER FROM SRQ TWR. IN THE PROCESS OF BEING HANDED OFF TO SRQ TWR, WE WERE 'CLRED TO LAND.' I WAS CAREFULLY MONITORING HIS RADIO PROCS MAKING SURE HE RESPONDED CORRECTLY. HE REPEATED THE CLRNC CORRECTLY, BUT WE BOTH HAD 'TOUCH-AND-GO' IN OUR MIND. WE PROCEEDED TO PERFORM A TOUCH-AND-GO ON RWY 4 AT SRQ AROUND XA40 IN THE MORNING. UPON TKOF, THE CTLR ASKED OUR INTENTIONS AND MY STUDENT RESPONDED INCORRECTLY AGAIN. THE CTLR BECAME SOMEWHAT UPSET AND QUESTIONED THE FACT THAT WE WERE AIRBORNE HAVING RECEIVED A CLRNC TO 'ALDN.' HE EXPLAINED HE HAD TFC IN THE AREA AND GAVE US A 250 DEG VECTOR. WE THEN WENT TO VENICE. MY STUDENT WAS UNAWARE OF THE PROB, SO A REVIEW OF GND SCHOOL OCCURRED IN POSTFLT. I REALIZED HOW I MAY HAVE BECOME A LITTLE COMPLACENT AND MUST LISTEN MORE CAREFULLY TO ATC AND NOT JUST MY STUDENT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.