Narrative:

IFR flight plan rock hill (uza) to shenandoah valley (shd). While on the ground received the following IFR clearance on the remote communication outlet (rco), 'cleared to shd by-way-of hugo 5 departure, robay transition, pulaski, montebello, direct. Maintain 2500 ft. Contact departure squawking XXXX. Hold for release.' completed checklist. Set radio and transponder for departure, then tried to contact charlotte approach for release with no success. Took off VFR to remain over rock hill below 2500 ft to contact approach while airborne. Did not change transponder to VFR code. This caused charlotte approach to believe the IFR departure was made without a release. Called charlotte approach after landing at shd to explain and was advised that the VFR departure was ok but should have been on the VFR code (1200). Was also advised that communication on some rco's is not good. Corrective action: pilot -- use appropriate transponder code. Approach control -- if too busy to answer a communication call, advise to standby to let the caller know the transmission was heard. If rco causes a continuous ground contact problem, a ground location on the airport where communication is successful should be published by the airport manager or an antenna relocation may possibly be needed.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A CORPORATE JET FLC DEPARTS THEIR NON TWR ARPT FOR A VFR PICK UP OF THE IFR CLRNC BUT FAILED TO SQUAWK A VFR CODE WHEN DOING SO AT UZA, SC.

Narrative: IFR FLT PLAN ROCK HILL (UZA) TO SHENANDOAH VALLEY (SHD). WHILE ON THE GND RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING IFR CLRNC ON THE REMOTE COM OUTLET (RCO), 'CLRED TO SHD BY-WAY-OF HUGO 5 DEP, ROBAY TRANSITION, PULASKI, MONTEBELLO, DIRECT. MAINTAIN 2500 FT. CONTACT DEP SQUAWKING XXXX. HOLD FOR RELEASE.' COMPLETED CHKLIST. SET RADIO AND XPONDER FOR DEP, THEN TRIED TO CONTACT CHARLOTTE APCH FOR RELEASE WITH NO SUCCESS. TOOK OFF VFR TO REMAIN OVER ROCK HILL BELOW 2500 FT TO CONTACT APCH WHILE AIRBORNE. DID NOT CHANGE XPONDER TO VFR CODE. THIS CAUSED CHARLOTTE APCH TO BELIEVE THE IFR DEP WAS MADE WITHOUT A RELEASE. CALLED CHARLOTTE APCH AFTER LNDG AT SHD TO EXPLAIN AND WAS ADVISED THAT THE VFR DEP WAS OK BUT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON THE VFR CODE (1200). WAS ALSO ADVISED THAT COM ON SOME RCO'S IS NOT GOOD. CORRECTIVE ACTION: PLT -- USE APPROPRIATE XPONDER CODE. APCH CTL -- IF TOO BUSY TO ANSWER A COM CALL, ADVISE TO STANDBY TO LET THE CALLER KNOW THE XMISSION WAS HEARD. IF RCO CAUSES A CONTINUOUS GND CONTACT PROB, A GND LOCATION ON THE ARPT WHERE COM IS SUCCESSFUL SHOULD BE PUBLISHED BY THE ARPT MGR OR AN ANTENNA RELOCATION MAY POSSIBLY BE NEEDED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.