Narrative:

We were level at 12000 ft, our assigned altitude. We were on assigned heading and airspeed. We received a TCASII alert on traffic at 1 O'clock position and 13000 ft. We spotted the aircraft visually. It appeared to fly above and behind our position. (The aircraft was an airline jet). We then received a climb RA. We notified ATC of our climb RA, turned off the autoplt and climbed approximately 2 or 300 ft as instructed by the RA. We then received a 'clear of conflict' message and returned to 12000 ft. We were told by ATC that the RA steered us toward another aircraft above. The TCASII tested ok both before and after the flight. It seems like TCASII tolerance is more restrictive than ATC separation tolerance. ATC sometimes vector aircraft near each other and RA's result. Perhaps TCASII tolerance should be taken into account in ATC vector separation.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN ACR MLG CLBED IN RESPONSE TO A TCASII COMMAND.

Narrative: WE WERE LEVEL AT 12000 FT, OUR ASSIGNED ALT. WE WERE ON ASSIGNED HDG AND AIRSPD. WE RECEIVED A TCASII ALERT ON TFC AT 1 O'CLOCK POS AND 13000 FT. WE SPOTTED THE ACFT VISUALLY. IT APPEARED TO FLY ABOVE AND BEHIND OUR POS. (THE ACFT WAS AN AIRLINE JET). WE THEN RECEIVED A CLB RA. WE NOTIFIED ATC OF OUR CLB RA, TURNED OFF THE AUTOPLT AND CLBED APPROX 2 OR 300 FT AS INSTRUCTED BY THE RA. WE THEN RECEIVED A 'CLR OF CONFLICT' MESSAGE AND RETURNED TO 12000 FT. WE WERE TOLD BY ATC THAT THE RA STEERED US TOWARD ANOTHER ACFT ABOVE. THE TCASII TESTED OK BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER THE FLT. IT SEEMS LIKE TCASII TOLERANCE IS MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN ATC SEPARATION TOLERANCE. ATC SOMETIMES VECTOR ACFT NEAR EACH OTHER AND RA'S RESULT. PERHAPS TCASII TOLERANCE SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN ATC VECTOR SEPARATION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.