Narrative:

While flying my assigned IFR route I heard from ATC, 'look for the ILS.' I responded 'roger.' about 3 mins later ATC queried me about the fact I had not started my descent for the approach. I responded by telling ATC I had not yet received a clearance for the approach. He said I was 'cleared' earlier and I should start my descent. I was in radar contact and never vacated my altitude after our miscom, so I do not think a conflict ever existed. However in a busy situation, or non radar environment a similar scenario could be dangerous. It seems clear that unless pilots and controllers avoid slang terms some confusion from slang is bound to exist.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A C172 WAS CLRED FOR AN ILS WITH THE WORDS, 'LOOK FOR THE ILS.' SINCE THE CLRNC WAS UNCLR, THE INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT DID NOT INTERCEPT THE APCH AND THE CTLR QUERIED.

Narrative: WHILE FLYING MY ASSIGNED IFR ROUTE I HEARD FROM ATC, 'LOOK FOR THE ILS.' I RESPONDED 'ROGER.' ABOUT 3 MINS LATER ATC QUERIED ME ABOUT THE FACT I HAD NOT STARTED MY DSCNT FOR THE APCH. I RESPONDED BY TELLING ATC I HAD NOT YET RECEIVED A CLRNC FOR THE APCH. HE SAID I WAS 'CLRED' EARLIER AND I SHOULD START MY DSCNT. I WAS IN RADAR CONTACT AND NEVER VACATED MY ALT AFTER OUR MISCOM, SO I DO NOT THINK A CONFLICT EVER EXISTED. HOWEVER IN A BUSY SIT, OR NON RADAR ENVIRONMENT A SIMILAR SCENARIO COULD BE DANGEROUS. IT SEEMS CLR THAT UNLESS PLTS AND CTLRS AVOID SLANG TERMS SOME CONFUSION FROM SLANG IS BOUND TO EXIST.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.