37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 512732 |
Time | |
Date | 200105 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zhu.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-88 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : lead technician |
Qualification | technician : powerplant technician : airframe |
Experience | maintenance avionics : 15 maintenance lead technician : 3 maintenance technician : 21 |
ASRS Report | 512732 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper documentation maintenance problem : improper maintenance non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : testing performance deficiency : inspection performance deficiency : logbook entry performance deficiency : repair |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft Chart Or Publication |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
The flight crew reported a large blue fluid flow back on left fuselage (tail) on preflight. I found no evidence of any active leak on any lavatory service panel and the stain was dried on and appeared to be old. All lavatories operated normally and I cleaned the fluid stain from the tail of the aircraft. After the aircraft departed and on further review of the maintenance manual, I noted that any evidence of lavatory leakage required procedures per airworthiness directive 96-22-10 be followed which include a pressurization of the aircraft to check for fluid leakage. Although there were no further write-ups of any lavatory leakage, I feel the FAA might possibly interpretation this write-up as falling under the requirements of airworthiness directive 96-22-10. In the future I will pressurize the aircraft to look for any possible leak to assure compliance of airworthiness directive 96-22-10.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN MD88 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH AN AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE PERTAINING TO LAVATORY LEAK PROCS NOT ACCOMPLISHED.
Narrative: THE FLC RPTED A LARGE BLUE FLUID FLOW BACK ON L FUSELAGE (TAIL) ON PREFLT. I FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF ANY ACTIVE LEAK ON ANY LAVATORY SVC PANEL AND THE STAIN WAS DRIED ON AND APPEARED TO BE OLD. ALL LAVATORIES OPERATED NORMALLY AND I CLEANED THE FLUID STAIN FROM THE TAIL OF THE ACFT. AFTER THE ACFT DEPARTED AND ON FURTHER REVIEW OF THE MAINT MANUAL, I NOTED THAT ANY EVIDENCE OF LAVATORY LEAKAGE REQUIRED PROCS PER AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE 96-22-10 BE FOLLOWED WHICH INCLUDE A PRESSURIZATION OF THE ACFT TO CHK FOR FLUID LEAKAGE. ALTHOUGH THERE WERE NO FURTHER WRITE-UPS OF ANY LAVATORY LEAKAGE, I FEEL THE FAA MIGHT POSSIBLY INTERP THIS WRITE-UP AS FALLING UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE 96-22-10. IN THE FUTURE I WILL PRESSURIZE THE ACFT TO LOOK FOR ANY POSSIBLE LEAK TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE 96-22-10.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.